LSAT Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the LSAT with our comprehensive quiz featuring multiple choice questions, hints, and detailed explanations. This is your ultimate guide to mastering the LSAT and boosting your confidence on test day!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

Which term best represents a set of facts rather than an argument?

Could Be False
Must Be True
What is a conclusion?
Logical Opposition

The correct answer is: Logical Opposition

The term "Logical Opposition" best represents a set of facts rather than an argument. This term refers to the relationship between two statements where the truth of one statement necessarily leads to the falsity of the other. In logic, it is not about making an argument but rather understanding the relationship between statements based on their logical connections. The other options are not focused on representing a set of facts but rather relate to argumentation and logical reasoning. "Could Be False" and "Must Be True" are terms commonly used in analyzing arguments and statements for validity. "What is a conclusion?" is a question that prompts thinking about the logical endpoint of an argument or set of premises.