LSAT Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the LSAT with our comprehensive quiz featuring multiple choice questions, hints, and detailed explanations. This is your ultimate guide to mastering the LSAT and boosting your confidence on test day!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

Which phrase could be used to imply a logical connection in a statement?

Must be that
So
Accordingly
Conclusion Indicator

The correct answer is: Must be that

"Must be that" is a phrase that implies a logical connection in a statement because it signifies a necessary inference or logical deduction. This phrase suggests that a particular conclusion is the only viable or reasonable outcome based on the preceding information. It indicates a strong logical relationship between the premises and the conclusion, making it a reliable indicator of a logical connection in a statement. Option B, "So," is a conclusion indicator and does not inherently imply a logical connection between statements. Option C, "Accordingly," is a conclusion indicator that denotes a logical consequence rather than a logical connection. Option D, "Conclusion Indicator," is too general and does not specifically address the concept of logical connection within a statement. Therefore, option A, "Must be that," is the most appropriate phrase to imply a logical connection in a statement.