Ace the LSAT 2025 – Master the Law School Entry Test with Style!

Question: 1 / 575

The structure of the reasoning in the argument above is most parallel to that in which one of the following?

A. An argument supported by empirical evidence

B. An argument that addresses all possible counterarguments

C. An argument that follows a flawed chain of logic

The argument in the passage is structured in a way that follows a flawed chain of logic. The speaker makes a conclusion based on a series of premises that do not logically lead to the conclusion. In this case, the conclusion that all students are happy because one student is satisfied does not logically follow.

The other options are not parallel to the structure of the reasoning in the argument provided:

A. An argument supported by empirical evidence – The argument in the passage does not rely on empirical evidence but rather on a flawed logic chain.

B. An argument that addresses all possible counterarguments – The argument in the passage does not address counterarguments; instead, it presents a flawed reasoning chain.

D. An argument that emphasizes emotional resonance – The argument in the passage does not rely on emotional appeals but rather on a flawed logical progression.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

D. An argument that emphasizes emotional resonance

Next Question

Report this question

Download LSAT Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy