Ace the LSAT 2025 – Master the Law School Entry Test with Style!

Question: 1 / 575

What can be inferred from the relationship "not s implies h"?

~s implies h can have both but must have at least one

h implies ~s can have none but not both

s implies not h can have none but not both

In the relationship "not s implies h," if s is not true, then h must be true. This means that if s does not happen, then h is guaranteed to happen. So, the correct inference from this relationship would be "s implies not h," which means if h does not happen, then s must be true. This is why option C is the correct choice.

Option A states "~s implies h can have both but must have at least one," which is not supported by the given relationship. Option B states "h implies ~s can have none but not both," which is not in line with the relationship provided. Option D states "~h implies s can have both but must have at least one," which is not the correct inference based on the relationship given.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

~h implies s can have both but must have at least one

Next Question

Report this question

Download LSAT Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy