Ace the LSAT 2025 – Master the Law School Entry Test with Style!

Question: 1 / 575

What is a common causal flaw that is depicted by the statement "A and B tend to occur together, so A must cause B"?

Provide an alternate cause

Show there is no causal relationship (merely a coincidence)

A violation of a law, command, or duty

A violation of a law, command, or duty

The common causal flaw depicted by the statement "A and B tend to occur together, so A must cause B" is known as committing a correlation-causation fallacy. This fallacy assumes that just because two events or variables are correlated or tend to occur together, one must cause the other. In reality, correlation does not necessarily imply causation. This type of faulty reasoning overlooks other possible explanations or factors that could be influencing the relationship between A and B. It is important to consider alternative causes and thoroughly investigate the situation rather than jumping to conclusions based on observed correlations.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next Question

Report this question

Download Ace the LSAT 2025 – Master the Law School Entry Test with Style! PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy