Ace the LSAT 2025 – Master the Law School Entry Test with Style!

The argument in the passage is based on a flawed line of reasoning that connects two unrelated events in order to make a persuasive point. In this case, the author argues that because the popularity of a reading method has increased over time, it must be effective. This is an example of building an argument on a foundation of logical fallacies, as the relationship between popularity and effectiveness is not logically sound. Option C best aligns with this flawed reasoning pattern, as building an argument on logical fallacies involves making connections that do not hold up under logical scrutiny. The other options do not exhibit the same type of flawed reasoning present in the passage.