Ace the LSAT 2026 – Master the Law School Entry Test with Style!

In LSAT terms, a Descriptive Conclusion refers to a type of conclusion that describes a particular situation or state of affairs without offering an evaluation or judgment. This type of conclusion aims to provide an accurate depiction or portrayal of a scenario without implying whether it is positive or negative.

Option C, "are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express one's anger," correctly captures the essence of a Descriptive Conclusion. This statement simply describes a situation where expressing anger could be seen as healthy without making a judgment about whether it is always the case or whether it is the best course of action.

The other options are not related to the logical construct of a Descriptive Conclusion:

- Option A talks about the types of conclusions in general and does not specifically address Descriptive Conclusions.

- Option B discusses comparisons, which are not directly related to Descriptive Conclusions.

- Option D mentions assertions of truth, which is a broader concept and not specific to the nature of Descriptive Conclusions.

Therefore, option C is the correct choice as it accurately represents the logical construct of a Descriptive Conclusion in LSAT terms.